← Back to the directory

Airship

Last update : September 22, 2026
Tool descriptionNot provided — is this listing about you? See what you can complete.

Results in the Tech Stack study

Results come from publishers’ answers and cannot be edited by the vendor. Learn more

3 %Adoption rate · of respondents
—sample too small to publish a score
Adoption rate by edition
2022 : 12 %12 %20222024 : 4 %4 %20242026 : 3 %3 %2026
Satisfaction by edition
68102022 : 7.2/107.220222024 : 5.5/105.520242026 : score not published2026

What its users say (5)

Sort:
7/10

“Mixed opinion; sometimes complex to get to grips with at certain publishers (interface not very user-friendly), but a solution in line with market standards.”

Tech Stack 2026
6/10

“A relevant solution that fits our needs but requires a proper learning curve. Packages whose prices rise very quickly, however.”

Tech Stack 2024
5/10

“Few synergies with the teams. Tool that is cumbersome to integrate into the back office.”

Tech Stack 2024
4/10

“Terrible user experience. Good deliverability.”

Tech Stack 2023
7/10

“High-performing and offers advanced features.”

Tech Stack 2023

Anonymised comments from study respondents.

Case studyNot provided — is this listing about you? See what you can complete.

Is this listing about you? — Airship

Write to us to complete this listing: description, case study, link to your website, logo. Scores, adoption rates and reviews come from the study and cannot be changed.

Adoption rates and satisfaction scores come from the Tech Stack study, an independent study run with the Sciences Po School of Journalism. Adoption is the share of questionnaire respondents citing the tool; satisfaction is the average score out of 10 given by its users. No score is published below 3 responses. Vendors cannot influence these results: they can only complete the presentation of their tool (description, case study, website, logo).