Arc XP
Results in the Tech Stack study
Results come from publishers’ answers and cannot be edited by the vendor. Learn more
What its users say (7)
8/10“On certain matters, a lack of flexibility.”
7/10“A CMS designed for web-first production, so it fits our strategy, BUT has been struggling to evolve for some time (2/3 years).”
8/10“SaaS solution, stable and well adopted by the newsroom (fairly intuitive compared with the previous CMSs, Swing and Methode Prime before that).”
8/10“Robust but little customisation.”
7/10“Lots of features and good copy tracking.”
9/10“Same as the previous question (Arc XP): the CMS was adopted quickly, everyone is happy with it. PageBuilder lets us launch new sections quickly and gives flexibility in editorial curation.”
10/10“Good solution incorporating many features.”
Anonymised comments from study respondents.