Dailymotion
Results in the Tech Stack study
Results come from publishers’ answers and cannot be edited by the vendor. Learn more
What its users say (17)
6/10“Nothing to report on delivery. No more after-sales support, and blocklists and configuration optimisations are not taken into account.”
7/10“Ease of use, good communication with the DM teams.”
7/10“For a free player, a very good player with good configuration and monetisation capabilities. On the other hand, support is scarce and there is no proactive optimisation advice.”
5/10“Publisher's choice. Monetisation being phased out.”
9/10“Suited to our use as a media outlet that films a large part of its programmes.”
10/10“Dailymotion gives us highly configurable players, with very useful options (picture in picture, horizontal/vertical adaptation…).”
6/10“Difficulty monetising through their ad sales house.”
8/10“The player integration could be improved.”
3/10“Complicated relationship, no evolution, little transparency.”
5/10“Player owned by the group.”
7/10“Monetisation needs improving.”
8/10“Ease of use and integration, no storage cost.”
8/10“A good ROI between hosting/delivery cost and fill rate.”
5/10“As before, but delivery works.”
5/10“We use Dailymotion mainly for advertising reasons, as ad integration with YouTube is not currently possible.”
6/10“Lack of transparency on ad delivery.”
8/10“Easy integration of the player on our site, good features, good relationship with the editorial team too, handy SDK for our app…”
Anonymised comments from study respondents.