Didomi
Results in the Tech Stack study
Results come from publishers’ answers and cannot be edited by the vendor. Learn more
What its users say (50)
9/10“Powerful, well-suited, compliant tool.”
4/10“Quality of the interfacing. ads.txt updates not handled.”
8/10“Easy to use.”
9/10“Relevant solution for ensuring compliance with our regulatory obligations while maintaining the balance with our business imperatives.”
10/10“Regular updates in line with new regulations. Good service / customer relationship.”
9/10“High-performing tool, updated quickly. Console allowing a high degree of autonomy. Regular and available support.”
8/10“Trusted by the CNIL.”
9/10“The reference and simple to use.”
9/10“Meets the need – stable but complex to keep on top of.”
6/10“Too expensive vs the services offered.”
4/10“Lack of flexibility.”
8/10“Works well and good support from the vendor on the tool's developments and on GDPR in general.”
8/10“Good tool and good support for the rollout.”
7/10“A solution that addresses the shared issues across our whole group.”
5/10“Configuration complexity. Ability to adapt to market changes ++. CNIL and GDPR compliance. Cross-device. Automatic cookie scanning.”
5/10“Positives: reliable in its primary role of collecting/managing consents. Negatives: gaps in the clarity of the statistics provided, little feedback on integration optimisations to improve web performance and, ultimately, relatively few customisation options.”
10/10“Easy solution to set up.”
6/10“A solution that gets heavier year after year.”
8/10“Development, customisation, industry feedback.”
7/10“The market reference. But still technical performance / loading problems.”
9/10“A CMP perfectly suited to the media world, a very comprehensive solution that delivers good consent rates.”
8/10“Good support and meets the need; easy to adjust. Group management could be improved.”
7/10“Lack of flexibility for customising the notices.”
8/10“Effective and good knowledge of legal issues. Performance problems and lack of developments to the solution.”
10/10“Responsive, fully meets the need.”
8/10“No issue around the CMP on our side. We set it up at the time, and it does what is needed. We are not very active on the tool, however.”
8/10“Nothing to report, works well. Broad product coverage in terms of support (web, apps, CTV, etc.). Regular updates and good support on changes in legislation. CSM needs improvement, a fifty-fifty chance of getting someone good.”
10/10“Excellent quality of support.”
6/10“Well, you do have to have one….”
7/10“Effective but sometimes lacks modularity.”
6/10“Solid tool but with performance issues to be addressed.”
7/10“Easy to use but performance problem.”
8/10“Easy to deploy and maintain.”
8/10“Complexity of the subject itself – but good responsiveness from the contacts, configurable solution – no need to implement too many things.”
7/10“GDPR and its burdens.”
6/10“Complex to maintain.”
7/10“Too rigid on the UX/UI side for testing.”
9/10“Does the job. No bugs reported.”
8/10“Everything works well.”
8/10“Easy to use.”
9/10“Plug & play + easy updates as the law evolves. However, it needs to be optimised a bit more for web performance.”
8/10“Response time a little slow at times.”
8/10“The tool is easy to use and functional.”
7/10“Easy to use + responsive after-sales support.”
7/10“We are in the process of deploying. Difficult implementation.”
7/10“Recently installed and in need of optimisation.”
8/10“Meets expectations.”
8/10“Delivers on their promise and easy to use.”
6/10“We are in the process of implementing, so little feedback so far.”
5/10“Our ad sales house's choice.”
Anonymised comments from study respondents.