Echobox
Results in the Tech Stack study
Results come from publishers’ answers and cannot be edited by the vendor. Learn more
What its users say (13)
7/10“This question is more one for marketing. But the tool seems satisfactory.”
8/10“Ease of use + high level of automation: requires no specific skills and gives our content better exposure on FB and IG.”
6/10“OK but not well enough adapted to new uses and needs on social media (video distribution, content adaptation).”
7/10“A tool that lets us schedule our posts.”
7/10“A good tool, but some social networks are becoming less and less compatible with this kind of tool. We need to question the future of these tools and see whether other solutions are available to us for managing our posts.”
2/10“Not very effective, poor handling of restrictions, bugs, lack of responsiveness, price.”
6/10“Not very far ahead on API changes.”
7/10“Being tested on some brands.”
8/10“Satisfactory solution, but recent difficulties on X (not attributable to Echobox, rather to X's arbitrary behaviour).”
9/10“Lots of feed options.”
5/10“Meets the need for 7-day-a-week coverage.”
8/10“We've been using Echobox for 3 months; easy to use. We are not yet seeing any beneficial effect on our traffic for the time being.”
8/10“The tool saves quite a lot of time and republishes on autopilot, so much more and better than manual publishing. But it remains expensive.”
Anonymised comments from study respondents.
