← Back to the directory

Google Ad Manager

Last update : September 22, 2026
Tool descriptionNot provided — is this listing about you? See what you can complete.

Results in the Tech Stack study

Results come from publishers’ answers and cannot be edited by the vendor. Learn more

74 %Adoption rate · of respondents
7.9/10Satisfaction
Most used
Adoption rate by edition
2022 : 61 %61 %20222023 : 57 %57 %20232024 : 66 %66 %20242026 : 74 %74 %2026
Satisfaction by edition
68102022 : 6.5/106.520222023 : 6.6/106.620232024 : 7.1/107.120242026 : 7.9/107.92026

What its users say (29)

Sort:
10/10

“Comprehensive, effective, powerful.”

Tech Stack 2026
6/10

“Reliable and well connected to partners.”

Tech Stack 2026
7/10

“The solution currently does not allow non-consented inventory to be addressed. The arbitration Google performs in its auction logic (between its own campaigns and the publisher's) remains a black box: there is room for doubt as to whether the publisher's interests are systematically defended.”

Tech Stack 2026
9/10

“Ease of use and market coverage.”

Tech Stack 2026
8/10

“GAM handles display, video, app, CTV and native, with a single interface to manage all campaigns. Management of priorities, floor prices, key-values, capping. Built-in forecasting tools to avoid overbooking and better package direct and programmatic guaranteed offers. But with the negative points we all know: dependency and market friction (conflict of interest, lack of transparency…).”

Tech Stack 2026
8/10

“The reference, bringing OpenRTB demand to our inventory with minimal effort, BUT opaque.”

Tech Stack 2026

Anonymised comments from study respondents.

Case studyNot provided — is this listing about you? See what you can complete.

Is this listing about you? — Google Ad Manager

Write to us to complete this listing: description, case study, link to your website, logo. Scores, adoption rates and reviews come from the study and cannot be changed.

Adoption rates and satisfaction scores come from the Tech Stack study, an independent study run with the Sciences Po School of Journalism. Adoption is the share of questionnaire respondents citing the tool; satisfaction is the average score out of 10 given by its users. No score is published below 3 responses. Vendors cannot influence these results: they can only complete the presentation of their tool (description, case study, website, logo).