Jira
Results in the Tech Stack study
Results come from publishers’ answers and cannot be edited by the vendor. Learn more
What its users say (17)
2/10“We use 5% of the features; the remaining 95% is bloatware that bombards you with pop-ups while you use it. Currently migrating to another solution.”
10/10“Meets our needs and requirements, very flexible.”
9/10“There is nothing more complete or more standard than Jira. We also use Jira Product Discovery on the Product Management side, and on the Tech Leads side for managing the P&T roadmap.”
8/10“Adopted by the Tech, IT and Product teams.”
9/10“Unified solution for all our projects.”
5/10“Jira is now practically useless to us apart from time logging; we are looking for an alternative, either directly in Notion or with Linear.”
8/10“Very good but too heavy for what it is.”
8/10“Atlassian remains a very good tracking tool.”
3/10“SaaS model too expensive.”
8/10“Not always simple but works well in Kanban mode.”
7/10“Fairly complex for needs that are sometimes simpler.”
7/10“You can do anything with this tool, at the cost of some slowness, hours of obscure configuration and a certain financial cost…”
6/10“Very resource-hungry. Confusing, sprawling interface.”
3/10“Jira is hell, Atlassian's product teams are sadists.”
7/10“OK, with the usual Jira complexity.”
7/10“Very comprehensive (even complex) solution but sometimes slow, and very expensive.”
9/10“Very comprehensive, even if configuration is a bit complex at times (on multi-board, for example)”
Anonymised comments from study respondents.