Non.li
Results in the Tech Stack study
Results come from publishers’ answers and cannot be edited by the vendor. Learn more
What its users say (29)
10/10“Very effective for management and audience.”
7/10“Fairly satisfied with the simplicity and effectiveness of the interface, for both publishing and monitoring.”
8/10“The tool saves a considerable amount of time in relaying all our publications.”
8/10“A comprehensive and flexible solution that delivers the expected service well.”
8/10“Effective. Easy to get to grips with.”
9/10“Very effective, with perfect user follow-up.”
9/10“Big time saving, robustness.”
8/10“Simplicity, support, advice.”
8/10“Very comprehensive tool, easy to get to grips with and reliable. Responsive customer service.”
5/10“It is not integrated into the CMS.”
8/10“Good automation and content suggestions. Risk: the community manager relies solely on AI and scoring to plan the brand's content, somewhat setting aside their own "brain" and intuition to showcase the media outlet's editorial strengths.”
8/10“Significant productivity gains. Responsive customer service.”
8/10“Ergonomic and easy-to-use tool that saves valuable time.”
6/10“Due to a lack of human resources, we do not use the tool to its full potential.”
8/10“I do not manage this aspect directly but it seems to be suitable. Recently put in place (before that everything was manual), it allows us to be more productive and to automate certain tasks.”
9/10“Satisfactory solution and very attentive customer service.”
9/10“Algorithm performance, ease of adoption and data visualisation + social listening.”
9/10“Practical, easy to use, can be automated.”
7/10“Publication automation works well and saves the newsroom time, but we are forced to keep Agorapulse alongside it for comment management.”
6/10“Stable and effective tool. Meets the newsroom's needs.”
8/10“Replaced Echobox, everyone is happy.”
8/10“Effective, great automation, enriched image generation and the ability to have floating links in the same place. Downside: the stats section is disappointing.”
10/10“Yes, the tool is satisfactory. The Bluesky module is currently missing.”
9/10“Makes it easy to manage more than 100 FB pages, with easily configurable bots.”
6/10“The change is recent but it seems fairly satisfactory.”
8/10“Effective – a few issues on X, obviously.”
8/10“Effective. User friendly.”
8/10“Suited to our organisation.”
5/10“Currently migrating to this solution, neutral score of 5/10.”
Anonymised comments from study respondents.