← Back to the directory

Outils Google (Drive, Sheets, Calendar)

Last update : September 22, 2026
Tool descriptionNot provided — is this listing about you? See what you can complete.

Results in the Tech Stack study

Results come from publishers’ answers and cannot be edited by the vendor. Learn more

48 %Adoption rate · of respondents
6.3/10Satisfaction
Most used
Adoption rate by edition
2022 : 30 %30 %20222023 : 33 %33 %20232024 : 49 %49 %20242026 : 48 %48 %2026
Satisfaction by edition
68102022 : 6.8/106.820222023 : 6.6/106.620232024 : 6.3/106.320242026 : 6.3/106.32026

What its users say (24)

Sort:
8/10

“"Policy" / "data" issues not satisfactory, but the tools are ok.”

Tech Stack 2026
6/10

“No integration with the CMS.”

Tech Stack 2026
5/10

“We do not have tools specifically for planning. The newsroom manages its editorial appointments/reminders via a shared Google Doc.”

Tech Stack 2026
6/10

“Works well, but not a tool optimised for this use.”

Tech Stack 2026
4/10

“It would be better if everything were integrated into the CMS.”

Tech Stack 2026
5/10

“1. Tool used only by the web department, which deprives the whole newsroom of an overall view of our newsroom's productions in progress (print, newsletters, videos). 2. Proliferation of Google Sheets depending on the editions (newsletters, site articles…). 3. Loss of major information between print and web productions (charts, data tables, infographics). 4. Multiplication of editorial planning management tasks when article dates are changed: for example, if a print article is pushed back by one issue, the "Word print menu" is re-sent by an assistant to the whole newsroom, then the article is changed in the print flatplan, then it has to be changed by hand in the Google Sheets for the web menu, etc. => We are exploring Desk-Net <3”

Tech Stack 2024

Anonymised comments from study respondents.

Case studyNot provided — is this listing about you? See what you can complete.

Is this listing about you? — Outils Google (Drive, Sheets, Calendar)

Write to us to complete this listing: description, case study, link to your website, logo. Scores, adoption rates and reviews come from the study and cannot be changed.

Adoption rates and satisfaction scores come from the Tech Stack study, an independent study run with the Sciences Po School of Journalism. Adoption is the share of questionnaire respondents citing the tool; satisfaction is the average score out of 10 given by its users. No score is published below 3 responses. Vendors cannot influence these results: they can only complete the presentation of their tool (description, case study, website, logo).