← Back to the directory

Sirius

Last update : September 22, 2026
Tool descriptionNot provided — is this listing about you? See what you can complete.

Results in the Tech Stack study

Results come from publishers’ answers and cannot be edited by the vendor. Learn more

10 %Adoption rate · of respondents
9.3/10Satisfaction
Highest satisfaction

What its users say (5)

Sort:
10/10

“In-house solution, flexible and open to enhancements. Also adapts to each publisher, despite a shared core.”

Tech Stack 2026
10/10

“It contains many useful modules and can be enriched with code via dedicated blocks in articles. It also integrates push and newsletter functions.”

Tech Stack 2026
8/10

“Constantly improving thanks to our needs.”

Tech Stack 2024
10/10

“Tool developed in close dialogue with the newsroom and in line with its needs.”

Tech Stack 2024
10/10

“It's the best possible editorial CMS for our group. Versatile, configurable, and designed with and for a newsroom.”

Tech Stack 2023

Anonymised comments from study respondents.

Case studyNot provided — is this listing about you? See what you can complete.

Is this listing about you? — Sirius

Write to us to complete this listing: description, case study, link to your website, logo. Scores, adoption rates and reviews come from the study and cannot be changed.

Adoption rates and satisfaction scores come from the Tech Stack study, an independent study run with the Sciences Po School of Journalism. Adoption is the share of questionnaire respondents citing the tool; satisfaction is the average score out of 10 given by its users. No score is published below 3 responses. Vendors cannot influence these results: they can only complete the presentation of their tool (description, case study, website, logo).