← Back to the directory

Trint

Last update : September 22, 2026
Tool descriptionNot provided — is this listing about you? See what you can complete.

Results in the Tech Stack study

Results come from publishers’ answers and cannot be edited by the vendor. Learn more

19 %Adoption rate · of respondents
7.8/10Satisfaction
Most usedHighest satisfaction
Adoption rate by edition
2022 : 7 %7 %20222023 : 12 %12 %20232024 : 26 %26 %20242026 : 19 %19 %2026
Satisfaction by edition
68102022 : 7.3/107.320222023 : 7.4/107.420232024 : 7.1/107.120242026 : 7.8/107.82026

What its users say (13)

Sort:
7/10

“It works pretty well :-)”

Tech Stack 2026
8/10

“Licence a bit expensive.”

Tech Stack 2026
7/10

“Fairly good transcriptions.”

Tech Stack 2024
8/10

“Fairly effective, but the solution has not yet been fully grasped and integrated by all the writers.”

Tech Stack 2024
6/10

“A bit expensive and the result is somewhat imperfect. Good relationship with the vendor.”

Tech Stack 2024
6/10

“I have just persuaded my team to adopt it. To be continued…”

Tech Stack 2024

Anonymised comments from study respondents.

Case studyNot provided — is this listing about you? See what you can complete.

Is this listing about you? — Trint

Write to us to complete this listing: description, case study, link to your website, logo. Scores, adoption rates and reviews come from the study and cannot be changed.

Adoption rates and satisfaction scores come from the Tech Stack study, an independent study run with the Sciences Po School of Journalism. Adoption is the share of questionnaire respondents citing the tool; satisfaction is the average score out of 10 given by its users. No score is published below 3 responses. Vendors cannot influence these results: they can only complete the presentation of their tool (description, case study, website, logo).