YouTube
Results in the Tech Stack study
Results come from publishers’ answers and cannot be edited by the vendor. Learn more
What its users say (19)
8/10“Enables good integration while boosting the performance of our videos on our channel.”
10/10“We do not produce a huge amount of video, but when we do, everything works as expected.”
7/10“Very easy to use. The annoying thing is the YT branding.”
9/10“Effective and ad-free.”
5/10“Technically flawless, but total dependence on the algorithm.”
8/10“A must. Compatible with all our challenges and other tools.”
5/10“It lets us host all our content, but monetisation is almost nil.”
8/10“Works well. Highly compatible.”
7/10“Always worried about their usage and privacy policy.”
8/10“Lucrative and viral.”
7/10“The most effective and simple.”
10/10“Serves the media outlet's SEO in general.”
6/10“Practical, easy, simple, well-known solution.”
5/10“The videos are hosted on YouTube, so we just have to grab the embed.”
8/10“Easily integrated into WordPress.”
7/10“Usage policy still very unclear.”
7/10“Known by everyone and easy to use.”
5/10“Free and easy to integrate.”
10/10“Perfectly integrated with WordPress.”
Anonymised comments from study respondents.
What its users say (1)
4/10“Little feedback so far, but we have access to a significant volume of CTV via the inventory of our YouTube channels.”
Anonymised comments from study respondents.