Cue
Results in the Tech Stack study
Results come from publishers’ answers and cannot be edited by the vendor. Learn more
What its users say (6)
8/10“A powerful solution, both flexible and complex, but fairly costly. Also integrates print tools.”
8/10“Very satisfied with the platform, with updates, but always paid for.”
6/10“Very easy for writing articles, but the view remains limited (no push notifications, social media sharing or newsletter sending from this tool).”
9/10“Multichannel content management and potential for customisation, but expensive.”
7/10“CUE CMS for digital publishing has a very good interface for digital-first workflows. The connection with CUE Print is not reliable and causes problems. Stibo itself is expensive and somewhat inflexible and bureaucratic in further development. Also due to their recent success on the international market.”
7/10“The UI is a bit complex.”
Anonymised comments from study respondents.
What its users say (2)
9/10“Good performance and simple.”
9/10“Very easy to get to grips with and native, hence good SEO performance…”
Anonymised comments from study respondents.