Flourish
Results in the Tech Stack study
Results come from publishers’ answers and cannot be edited by the vendor. Learn more
What its users say (12)
8/10“Effective. Easy. Fast. Drawback: not easy to customise and, on infographics with several entries, not sure the user realises there are several entries (e.g. tracking the price trends of different fuels, the reader almost certainly does not see that they need to do something to view the prices of diesel, unleaded, etc.).”
6/10“Good for a free solution.”
6/10“Good and free. But few upgrades in recent years.”
6/10“Flourish. A bit kitsch but does the job.”
7/10“It is fairly easy to get to grips with, which means most journalists can produce simple infographics using the brand's style guide. Support for oEmbed is a plus as it allows very visual integration into our CMSs. What is missing is the ability to create an infographic via APIs, which would be a real plus.”
9/10“Flourish = dynamic infographics.”
8/10“Lots of possibilities; you can animate and customise.”
8/10“Currently rolling out the premium part. API not great.”
8/10“Easy and well adopted.”
8/10“Matches our needs.”
6/10“Lack of resources here too.”
7/10“It's fairly simple and intuitive!”
Anonymised comments from study respondents.
What its users say (2)
5/10“Not specialised in maps but does the job.”
6/10“Excellent except for the price. Really too expensive. Around 6k USD per year. We are thinking of going back to Datawrapper.”
Anonymised comments from study respondents.