GitHub
Results in the Tech Stack study
Results come from publishers’ answers and cannot be edited by the vendor. Learn more
What its users say (17)
10/10“Meets our needs and requirements.”
10/10“The standard for open source and collaborative developers.”
10/10“Simply the most standard.”
9/10“GitHub Actions is fairly easy to use and implement for CI.”
7/10“Less stable since the Microsoft acquisition.”
9/10“High-performing and constantly evolving.”
7/10“Market leader that establishes itself as the obvious choice and is easy for the various teams to adopt.”
7/10“GitHub's main strength lies in its vast ecosystem of third-party integrations and the fact that developers already know it well, which makes onboarding considerably simpler. On the other hand, its project management features still leave room for improvement and lack depth compared with dedicated tools.”
10/10“The ultimate reference.”
10/10“The best and the most widely used.”
10/10“Ease of use.”
7/10“Practical, we make heavy use of GitHub Actions, and the integration with Copilot.”
7/10“Very effective for developers.”
9/10“Very powerful, very comprehensive, but some downtime that is very paralysing.”
9/10“Practical, unavoidable on the market.”
9/10“Perfect for our small team.”
8/10“A standard. Imposed by our supplier.”
Anonymised comments from study respondents.
What its users say (1)
5/10“Adopting GitHub for project management is above all driven by a desire to streamline our technical stack. By centralising code and task management in a single tool, we avoid a proliferation of third-party software and simplify the team's workflows.”
Anonymised comments from study respondents.