← Back to the directory

IAS

Last update : September 22, 2026
Tool descriptionNot provided — is this listing about you? See what you can complete.

Results in the Tech Stack study

Results come from publishers’ answers and cannot be edited by the vendor. Learn more

58 %Adoption rate · of respondents
6.5/10Satisfaction
Most usedHighest satisfaction

What its users say (6)

Sort:
5/10

“Measurement providers must fight alongside publishers to optimise blocklists and be transparent, so as not to take revenue from both sides.”

Tech Stack 2026
9/10

“Recognised and reliable solution on the market, with adequate support to meet the various needs.”

Tech Stack 2026
3/10

“Service is nowhere to be found. Behind on attention measurement.”

Tech Stack 2026
6/10

“Too buy-side oriented, and not very advanced for the sell side.”

Tech Stack 2026
10/10

“Leading solution in France and very well established among advertisers. To manage campaigns, it is therefore preferable to have the same tools. The benefits: brand suitability respected, viewability measurement, attention.”

Tech Stack 2026
8/10

“Meets our needs.”

Tech Stack 2026

Anonymised comments from study respondents.

Case studyNot provided — is this listing about you? See what you can complete.

Is this listing about you? — IAS

Write to us to complete this listing: description, case study, link to your website, logo. Scores, adoption rates and reviews come from the study and cannot be changed.

Adoption rates and satisfaction scores come from the Tech Stack study, an independent study run with the Sciences Po School of Journalism. Adoption is the share of questionnaire respondents citing the tool; satisfaction is the average score out of 10 given by its users. No score is published below 3 responses. Vendors cannot influence these results: they can only complete the presentation of their tool (description, case study, website, logo).