← Back to the directory

Matomo

Last update : September 22, 2026
Tool descriptionNot provided — is this listing about you? See what you can complete.

Results in the Tech Stack study

Results come from publishers’ answers and cannot be edited by the vendor. Learn more

14 %Adoption rate · of respondents
7.2/10Satisfaction
Adoption rate by edition
2022 : 11 %11 %20222023 : 13 %13 %20232026 : 14 %14 %2026
Satisfaction by edition
68102022 : 5.7/105.720222023 : 5.6/105.620232026 : 7.2/107.22026

What its users say (8)

Sort:
8/10

“Good alternative but zero interoperability.”

Tech Stack 2026
3/10

“Not very suited to media. Only keeps the 5,000 most viewed pages. Lacks granularity.”

Tech Stack 2024
8/10

“Matomo offers a very large number of building blocks for analysis.”

Tech Stack 2023
5/10

“Tool with basic options and installed without customisation.”

Tech Stack 2023
1/10

“Not practical, stays on the surface, impossible to get KPIs that make sense for a media company.”

Tech Stack 2023
7/10

“Overall satisfied post-migration from Google Analytics.”

Tech Stack 2023

Anonymised comments from study respondents.

Case studyNot provided — is this listing about you? See what you can complete.

Is this listing about you? — Matomo

Write to us to complete this listing: description, case study, link to your website, logo. Scores, adoption rates and reviews come from the study and cannot be changed.

Adoption rates and satisfaction scores come from the Tech Stack study, an independent study run with the Sciences Po School of Journalism. Adoption is the share of questionnaire respondents citing the tool; satisfaction is the average score out of 10 given by its users. No score is published below 3 responses. Vendors cannot influence these results: they can only complete the presentation of their tool (description, case study, website, logo).