← Back to the directory

Ownpage

Last update : September 22, 2026
Tool descriptionNot provided — is this listing about you? See what you can complete.

Results in the Tech Stack study

Results come from publishers’ answers and cannot be edited by the vendor. Learn more

16 %Adoption rate · of respondents
6.3/10Satisfaction
Top 3 most used
Adoption rate by edition
2022 : 19 %19 %20222023 : 22 %22 %20232024 : 19 %19 %20242026 : 16 %16 %2026
Satisfaction by edition
68102022 : 7.0/107.020222023 : 6.6/106.620232024 : 7.6/107.620242026 : 6.3/106.32026

What its users say (5)

Sort:
8/10

“Yes, I am satisfied with our newsletter / e-mailing solution (Ownpage – Qiota / Opper group). From a technical standpoint, the platform is reliable: sending is stable, deliverability is good, and the tool fits well into our organisation (templates, targeting). In terms of use, the interface is clear and allows campaigns to be produced and scheduled quickly, with good control over content and lists. Finally, support is responsive and the assistance is high quality, with effective exchanges and resources (guides / help sessions) that help you build your skills and make the most of the solution's features.”

Tech Stack 2026
10/10

“Performance of the personalised approach.”

Tech Stack 2024
8/10

“Yes, a few limitations to the tool, particularly in integrating newsletter mock-ups. But good synergy with the teams, reliable tool.”

Tech Stack 2024
5/10

“Too home-made a solution, currently being replaced.”

Tech Stack 2023
9/10

“Meets all our needs.”

Tech Stack 2023

Anonymised comments from study respondents.

Case studyNot provided — is this listing about you? See what you can complete.

Is this listing about you? — Ownpage

Write to us to complete this listing: description, case study, link to your website, logo. Scores, adoption rates and reviews come from the study and cannot be changed.

Adoption rates and satisfaction scores come from the Tech Stack study, an independent study run with the Sciences Po School of Journalism. Adoption is the share of questionnaire respondents citing the tool; satisfaction is the average score out of 10 given by its users. No score is published below 3 responses. Vendors cannot influence these results: they can only complete the presentation of their tool (description, case study, website, logo).