Poool Access
Results in the Tech Stack study
Results come from publishers’ answers and cannot be edited by the vendor. Learn more
What its users say (48)
8/10“Dashboard improvements, very good customer service and team, but less support from the teams on the roadmap than before.”
7/10“Not easy to connect with Mahalo, lack of autonomy on the marketing side due to how we operate internally, but that should improve in the coming weeks.”
7/10“Limited in data collection.”
8/10“We do not use the tool to 100%, in particular segmentation, and it is not very easy to get to grips with, but it does the job.”
7/10“On the web, it lets you go quite far in implementing use cases. On the app, some features are still missing to make it easier for business teams to integrate paywalls. We often need technical intervention.”
7/10“The only thing missing is the ability to create dynamic content that adapts to the content.”
7/10“Comprehensive tool, but we currently lack the resources to run it properly on a day-to-day basis and regularly create different scenarios.”
8/10“Lots of possibilities, but sometimes difficult when it comes to activation and the interplay of the various rules, as well as coordination between business and product. Effective on conversion journeys and on-site A/B testing logic.”
7/10“Easy-to-use and effective tool. Pain point: performance problems and impact on site performance.”
6/10“No paywall at our company; however, we use Poool Access to generate cookie walls on our sites. A rich solution but complex to grasp, in particular the implementation / setup, and the targeting constraints are too great.”
9/10“Very satisfied.”
8/10“Easy to use, powerful configuration.”
8/10“Good tool, good support from the teams.”
6/10“We are in the start-up phase. Weakness already noted on measuring results (conversion), which cannot be done in the tool.”
8/10“Customisation and ease of use. Missing a React module for the app, and needs optimising on data visualisation to make it easier to track the many variants.”
8/10“Marketing teams are autonomous on the tool, responsive support team, designs easy to change. However, the stats could be improved.”
7/10“Comprehensive solution. Understanding of publishers' needs ++. Flexibility and customisation ++. Expertise and support ++. Professional community ++. Complexity of use and integration for the teams.”
9/10“The appearance builder is not very user-friendly, CSS skills needed.”
7/10“Good solution, and good customer relationship. Sometimes some internal sluggishness in integrating new use cases.”
7/10“Good availability of the teams but sometimes a lack of knowledge of the solution to support implementations. Good development of the features (e.g. BF countdown).”
9/10“Effective solution. Work on the impact on CLS.”
8/10“Effective and easy to use.”
8/10“Great since more pre-built templates were added, and great for the responsive after-sales support ;)”
7/10“Simple solution, quality of the relationship.”
8/10“Excellent tool. Probably under-used due to a lack of skills (and time) in-house.”
8/10“Yes. Good synergy with our Poool consultant.”
5/10“Technical performance needs work (CLS… articles jumping around…).”
8/10“Easy to use, innovative.”
8/10“Easy to use and good support to maximise usage.”
8/10“Responsiveness and availability of the contacts – slight dissatisfaction with the implementation on our sites (client side).”
6/10“Scripts sometimes heavy.”
7/10“Time to market sometimes complicated for any new scenario.”
7/10“The solution does the job required. Our contact and the associated media are great!”
8/10“Implementation in progress.”
5/10“Uses too much CPU.”
8/10“Satisfied! That said, the tool is not easy to grasp for newcomers (but with good support, it works well 😉 ).”
7/10“The tool allows multiple uses of the paywall, but it requires ongoing human resources to manage it effectively.”
8/10“Value of working on the whole funnel according to customer affinities.”
8/10“Very powerful, flexible and excellent support.”
8/10“A great solution and a great team :)”
7/10“Works well, but too easy to bypass (JS wall).”
10/10“Meets all our needs.”
9/10“Amply meets our needs and our scaling with a tool that is accessible both for development and for management.”
7/10“Lack of resources to explore all the features.”
8/10“Tool that suits us well. Connecting with other tools sometimes takes too much time, and perhaps a lack of flexibility in that respect.”
7/10“Poool allows us to set up many interesting scenarios that help drive newsletter sign-ups and then subscription.”
7/10“Effective tool, great support team. The interface, on the other hand, is not always intuitive when you do not use it every day.”
7/10“Great tool and marketing flexibility but still progress to be made on integrating the publisher's technical specifics.”
Anonymised comments from study respondents.
What its users say (5)
7/10“No hindsight yet, the app has only just been launched.”
7/10“Limited in data collection.”
5/10“Quite a few difficulties encountered in implementing our use cases. Lots of back and forth between the Poool teams and my teams. I think the tool could be easier to use.”
7/10“Not yet officially launched, still being finalised and fine-tuned…”
“Poool Access currently being implemented, same comment as for the web.”
Anonymised comments from study respondents.